Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act could validly be levied in reassessment proceedings after earlier penalty proceedings had been dropped pursuant to the order setting aside the original assessment.
Analysis: The assessment originally made was set aside and a fresh assessment was directed. The earlier penalty proceedings, which had been initiated on the basis of the original assessment, were dropped in view of that appellate order. On the fresh assessment, and after the Tribunal found concealment of income, the initiation of penalty proceedings on the basis of the reassessment was held to be within jurisdiction. The scope of section 271(1) was treated as wide enough to cover penalty proceedings arising from reassessment or remand-based proceedings.
Conclusion: Penalty under section 271(1)(c) could be levied in reassessment proceedings; the answer was in the affirmative, against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an original assessment is set aside and a fresh assessment is made, penalty proceedings may validly be initiated on the basis of the reassessment if concealment is ultimately found, and the earlier dropping of penalty proceedings does not bar such action.