Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee family, having been assessed only in respect of income from property and not in respect of business, profession or vocation, was entitled to the benefit of Section 25(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1922.
Analysis: The relief under Section 25(3) was confined to cases where tax had at any time been charged under the Indian Income-tax Act, 1918, on business, profession or vocation that was later discontinued. The statutory language was plain and could not be extended by reference to supposed anomalies or consequences. The scheme of the Income-tax Act, 1922 treated income from property as a separate head from profits and gains of business, profession or vocation, and the computation provisions also kept them distinct. On that construction, Section 25(3) had no application where the assessment related only to property income.
Conclusion: The assessee was not entitled to the benefit of Section 25(3), and the question referred was answered in the negative.