Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the application for registration of the firm under section 26A was filed within the prescribed time and in conformity with the rules for grant of registration.
Analysis: The firm was deemed to have been constituted from the earlier date stated in the partnership deed, not from the date on which the deed was formally executed. On that footing, the application for registration was not made within six months of the constitution of the firm as required by rule 2(a)(i) of the Indian Income-tax Rules, 1922. The firm was also not registered under the Partnership Act before the end of the previous year, because registration takes effect only when the certificate is granted, not from the date of application. No application for condonation of delay had been made.
Conclusion: The application for registration was time-barred and not in conformity with the rules, and the issue was decided against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered against the assessee, affirming that the refusal of registration was justified.
Ratio Decidendi: For registration under section 26A, the relevant date is the actual constitution of the firm, and registration under the Partnership Act is effective only on grant of the certificate; an application filed beyond the prescribed period is time-barred unless delay is duly condoned.