Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Insolvency and Bankruptcy

        2019 (12) TMI 1366 - Tri - Insolvency and Bankruptcy

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal rules uninvoked guarantees not claims under Insolvency Code, appoints new RP for resolution process The tribunal ruled that uninvoked corporate guarantees cannot be considered claims under the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code. Such guarantees should not ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Tribunal rules uninvoked guarantees not claims under Insolvency Code, appoints new RP for resolution process

                            The tribunal ruled that uninvoked corporate guarantees cannot be considered claims under the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code. Such guarantees should not impact the determination of voting shares, which are based on financial debt owed. The tribunal found the Resolution Professional's inclusion of the uninvoked guarantee in determining voting shares inconsistent and appointed a new RP to ensure smooth implementation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process. ICICI Bank's claim and voting share are to be recomputed, and all documents/assets are to be transferred to the new RP. No costs were awarded in the disposition of the application.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Whether the amount of uninvoked corporate guarantee could be considered as a claim under the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
                            2. Whether the uninvoked corporate guarantee can be taken into consideration for determining the voting share of a financial creditor.
                            3. Whether the decision of the Resolution Professional (RP) aligns with the scheme and objects of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

                            Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Uninvoked Corporate Guarantee as a Claim:
                            The tribunal examined whether an uninvoked corporate guarantee could be considered a claim under the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016. It was argued that the corporate debtor had given a corporate guarantee for a loan to Skipper Furnishings Pvt. Ltd., which had not been invoked, nor had the principal borrower defaulted. The tribunal referenced judicial decisions, noting that in the case of Export Import Bank of India, the guarantee had been invoked, making it factually different. The tribunal also considered the decision in Axis Bank Ltd. vs. Edu Smart Services Pvt. Ltd., which was overruled by a subsequent decision in Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd. vs. Orissa Manganese and Minerals Ltd., indicating that uninvoked guarantees do not qualify as claims. The tribunal concluded that a claim must be due to be considered a debt, and an uninvoked corporate guarantee does not meet this criterion.

                            2. Uninvoked Corporate Guarantee and Voting Share:
                            The tribunal then addressed whether an uninvoked corporate guarantee could be used to determine the voting share of a financial creditor. It was emphasized that voting rights are based on the financial debt owed to a creditor, not on claims. The tribunal referred to Section 5(28) of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016, which defines voting share based on the proportion of financial debt owed. Since an uninvoked guarantee is not a debt owed, it should not influence voting rights. The tribunal also rejected the argument based on the IBBI circular, stating that circulars cannot override substantive provisions of the Code. It was concluded that contingent claims like uninvoked guarantees should not impact voting shares as they are inferior to actual claims.

                            3. Decision of the RP and Scheme of the Code:
                            Finally, the tribunal assessed whether the RP's actions were consistent with the Code's objectives. The RP had included the uninvoked corporate guarantee in determining voting shares, which was contested by other financial creditors. The tribunal noted that the RP had not sought a legal opinion as agreed upon in a CoC meeting and had inconsistently treated similar claims from different creditors. The tribunal found this approach problematic and decided to replace the RP to ensure smooth implementation of the CIRP. The new RP was appointed, and the tribunal ordered the recomputation of ICICI Bank's claim and voting share.

                            Summary of Findings:
                            a) Uninvoked corporate guarantees cannot be considered claims under the Code.
                            b) Uninvoked corporate guarantees should not influence the determination of voting shares.
                            c) ICICI Bank's claim and voting share must be recomputed.
                            d) The current RP is to be replaced, and all documents/assets handed over to the new RP.

                            The tribunal disposed of the application accordingly, with no order as to costs.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found