Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a notice calling for accounts and documents under Section 22(4) of the Income-tax Act, 1922 could be validly issued after the assessee had filed a return, and whether the earlier view that such power ended on filing of the return was correct.
Analysis: Section 22(4) was construed as being attracted once a notice under Section 22(2) had been served; the section itself imposed no restriction that the notice must be issued only before the return was filed. Reading Section 22 with Section 23(4), the filing of a return was held not to extinguish the statutory power to require production of accounts or documents. The sub-section was read as contemplating distinct situations, and the mere words relied upon in the earlier decision did not justify cutting down the plain language of the statute. The absence of any requirement that the notice specify the statutory provision was also held not to invalidate the notice.
Conclusion: The power under Section 22(4) continued even after a return had been made, provided the foundational notice under Section 22(2) had been served. The earlier decision was held to be wrongly decided on that point.
Ratio Decidendi: A notice under Section 22(4) of the Income-tax Act, 1922 is not confined to the period before filing of the return and remains valid after a return is filed, so long as the statutory condition precedent of service of a notice under Section 22(2) is satisfied.