Just a moment...

Top
Help
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Taxable Income Reassessment Ordered for 1984-85; AO to Reevaluate Based on New Settlement Terms and Allow Representation.</h1> <h3>Inspecting Assistant Commissioner (Assessment) Versus Hydrocarbons India Ltd. And (Vice-Versa)</h3> The ITAT allowed the appeal, directing the AO to reassess the taxable income for the assessment year 1984-85, considering the previous year ending ... Effective date of settlement agreement - determination of what is the taxable 'previous year' - HELD THAT:- We are unable to concur with Commissioner of Income-tax (DR) objection that the effective date of settlement agreement is not January 1, 1984. As in the case of CIT v. Patiala Sales Corporation Pvt. Ltd. [1970 (1) TMI 9 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] has held that the option given by the statutory provisions of section 3(1)(b) is to the assessee and not to the Department and once such an option is exercised the Department has no alternative but to assess the income in accordance with the option so exercised. AR has highlighted the facts of the case from the computation of income filed by the assessee. In the computation/s for the assessment years 1981-82 to 1984-85, the assessee has categorically mentioned its accounting year/previous year as ending with the calendar year. It is only with effect from the assessment year 1985-86 that the assessee has shifted to financial year being its previous year. Undisputedly, for the twelve month period relevant to assessment year 1984-85 the assessee has drawn up its accounts as year ending December 31, 1983 Assessee has validly, exercised its option as envisaged in section 3(1)(b) of the Act. We, therefore, find considerable merit in the additional ground of appeal and the same is, therefore, allowed. AO is accordingly directed to assess the taxable total income of the assessee for the assessment year 1984-85 with taking the 'previous year' as on January 1, 1983 to December 31, 1983 and considering the effective date of settlement agreement as January 1, 1984. Assessing Officer is given the liberty to take necessary remedial steps as per law for assessment of compensation flowing to the assessee under the settlement agreement in the appropriate assessment year - entire issues raised before us by both the parties will also have to be necessarily re- examined afresh by the Assessing Officer. Accordingly, all the issues raised by both the parties are also restored to the file of the Assessing Officer to be decided afresh in terms of our observations after giving due opportunity to the assessee. Issues Involved:1. Admission of Additional Ground of Appeal.2. Determination of the 'Previous Year' for Taxation.3. Effective Date of the Settlement Agreement.4. Taxability of Compensation Received under the Settlement Agreement.5. Remedial Steps for Assessment of Compensation in the Appropriate Assessment Year.Detailed Analysis:1. Admission of Additional Ground of Appeal:The primary issue was whether the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) should admit the additional ground of appeal raised by the assessee. The Hon’ble Delhi High Court had previously observed that the ITAT erred in not admitting and adjudicating upon the additional ground of appeal. The High Court stated, 'if the facts and material available with the Tribunal give rise to a pure question of law, then the Tribunal ought not have any difficulty in entertaining the additional ground.' The Tribunal was directed to consider the additional ground without allowing the assessee to rely on new material.2. Determination of the 'Previous Year' for Taxation:The moot issue was the determination of the taxable 'previous year.' The assessee contended that its previous year ended on December 31, 1983, as it had consistently prepared its accounts on a calendar year basis. Section 3 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, provided the option for the assessee to select a previous year different from the financial year. The Tribunal noted that the assessee had validly exercised this option, stating, 'the assessee has categorically mentioned its accounting year/previous year as ending with the calendar year.'3. Effective Date of the Settlement Agreement:The effective date of the settlement agreement was crucial for determining the taxable year. The Tribunal found that the effective date of the settlement agreement was January 1, 1984, as evidenced by a fax message and the audited financial statements. The Tribunal stated, 'the effective date of settlement agreement is January 1, 1984,' and this was undisputed even before the High Court.4. Taxability of Compensation Received under the Settlement Agreement:The compensation received under the settlement agreement was in question for its taxability in the assessment year 1984-85. The Tribunal directed that the taxable total income for the assessment year 1984-85 should be assessed with the previous year ending on December 31, 1983, and considering the effective date of the settlement agreement as January 1, 1984. The Tribunal emphasized, 'the Assessing Officer had erred in making the impugned additions in terms of settlement agreement in assessment year 1984-85.'5. Remedial Steps for Assessment of Compensation in the Appropriate Assessment Year:The Tribunal allowed the Assessing Officer (AO) to take necessary remedial steps for the assessment of compensation in the appropriate assessment year. It directed, 'the Assessing Officer is given the liberty to take necessary remedial steps as per law for assessment of compensation flowing to the assessee under the settlement agreement in the appropriate assessment year.'Conclusion:The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee and the Department for statistical purposes. It directed the AO to reassess the taxable total income for the assessment year 1984-85, considering the previous year ending on December 31, 1983, and the effective date of the settlement agreement as January 1, 1984. All issues raised by both parties were restored to the file of the AO for re-examination afresh, ensuring due opportunity for the assessee. The order was pronounced in the open court on April 6, 2018.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found