Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Companies Law

        2020 (1) TMI 1271 - Tri - Companies Law

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal approves Amalgamation Scheme under Companies Act, 2013 The Tribunal sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between the Transferor Company and the Transferee Company under Sections 230 to 232 of the Companies ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Tribunal approves Amalgamation Scheme under Companies Act, 2013

                            The Tribunal sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between the Transferor Company and the Transferee Company under Sections 230 to 232 of the Companies Act, 2013. Despite observations raised by the Regional Director and the Official Liquidator, the Petitioner Companies assured compliance, leading to the approval of the scheme. The Tribunal emphasized the need for statutory compliances and clarified that the sanction does not exempt the companies from payment obligations. Specific orders were issued for the transfer of assets, liabilities, employee transition, and filing requirements, concluding the approval process for the Scheme of Amalgamation.




                            Issues: Approval of Scheme of Amalgamation under Companies Act, 2013

                            Analysis:
                            1. The Joint Company Petition was filed for the approval of the Scheme of Amalgamation between two companies, the Transferor Company and the Transferee Company, under Sections 230 to 232 of the Companies Act, 2013, along with other applicable provisions and rules.
                            2. A dispensation of meetings of Equity Shareholders, Secured Creditors, and Unsecured Creditors was sought and granted by the Tribunal in a previous order based on the First Motion Application filed by the companies.
                            3. Petitioner Companies filed petitions for the sanction of the Scheme, and necessary directions were issued for notice to Statutory/Regulatory Authorities and paper publication in specific newspapers.
                            4. Affidavit of service was filed by the Petitioner Companies regarding compliance with the Tribunal's orders, including paper publication and serving notices to relevant authorities.
                            5. The Regional Director, Chennai, submitted a report raising observations regarding the Scheme, specifically related to the authorized capital of the Transferee Company and the payment of fees post-amalgamation.
                            6. The Petitioner Companies assured compliance with the observations raised by the Regional Director and sought suitable directions in this regard.
                            7. The Official Liquidator reported that the affairs of the Transferor Company were not conducted prejudicially, as per the provisions of the Companies Act.
                            8. The Chartered Accountant appointed by the Official Liquidator provided observations on the financial aspects of the companies, including shareholders' funds, share valuation, accounting treatment, and exchange ratio post-merger.
                            9. The Tribunal directed the Transferor Company to pay fees to the Official Liquidator for the Auditor who investigated the Transferor Company's affairs.
                            10. No representation was received from the Income Tax Department, and the Tribunal presumed no objection from them regarding the Scheme.
                            11. The Petitioner Companies submitted a certificate of compliance with Accounting Standards, fulfilling statutory requirements under the Companies Act, 2013.
                            12. Previous judgments were cited regarding the right of the Income Tax Department in schemes of amalgamation, emphasizing the protection granted to the Department for recovery of tax dues.
                            13. The Petitioner Companies confirmed the absence of investigation proceedings or pending actions against them under relevant provisions of the Companies Act.
                            14. In the absence of objections and with all statutory compliances fulfilled, the Tribunal sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation.
                            15. The Tribunal clarified that the sanction does not exempt the companies from payment of stamp duty, taxes, or other charges if due under the law, and actions can be taken against concerned persons for any violations.
                            16. Specific orders were issued regarding the transfer of properties, liabilities, proceedings, appointed date, employee transition, share allotment, and filing of documents with the Registrar of Companies.
                            17. The joint Company Petition was allowed based on the terms mentioned in the order, concluding the approval process for the Scheme of Amalgamation.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found