Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the notification issued under section 138(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 applied generally to all assessees or was confined to assessees being banking companies.
Analysis: The opening words of the notification referred to the practices and usages customary among banking companies, and the clause had to be read as a whole. The words relating to furnishing of information, production of documents, and assessment or recovery proceedings were qualified by the concluding description of the assessee as a banking company within the meaning of section 34A of the Banking Companies Act, 1949. A detached reading of the earlier words would be contrary to the natural grammatical structure of the provision. On that construction, the notification was intended to operate only in respect of banking companies, and not generally for all assessees.
Conclusion: The notification did not assist the appellant and applied only to banking companies; the challenge to the impugned order failed.
Ratio Decidendi: A notification issued under section 138(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 must be construed as a whole, and where its language and opening context restrict its operation to a specified class of assessees, it cannot be extended by isolating earlier general words from the limiting words that qualify them.