Land acquisition valuation turns on comparable sale evidence, and severance compensation stands where the balance land lacks independent utility.

In land acquisition valuation, market value must be fixed by the most comparable sale evidence and reliable contemporaneous material on the notification date; the Bombay HC held that the Reference Court had relied on an inapplicable higher entry and reduced the rate to Rs. 500 per sq. mtr., treating the applicable ready reckoner and government policy as valid valuation guides. On severance, the claim for compensation for the unacquired 344 sq. mtrs. was upheld because the balance land had no proved independent access or separate utility and was shown to be unusable as an independent plot.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the market value of the acquired land fixed by the Reference Court at Rs. 600 per sq. mtr. required interference and what the correct market rate was on the date of notification. (ii) Whether the claimants were entitled to compensation for severance in respect of the unacquired balance land admeasuring 344 sq. mtrs.

Issue (i): Whether the market value of the acquired land fixed by the Reference Court at Rs. 600 per sq. mtr. required interference and what the correct market rate was on the date of notification.

Analysis: The acquired land had clear non-agricultural potentiality, but valuation had to be fixed with reference to comparable sale instances and other reliable material existing on the date of notification. The Court found the sale instance from the neighbouring land to be the most comparable evidence and held that the Reference Court ought to have taken the 1989 ready reckoner rate applicable to the locality rather than relying on the higher 1992 entry. The Government Resolution dated 31/10/1994 was treated as a valid policy guide for adopting the higher of the sale-purchase valuation and the ready reckoner valuation. On that basis, the market rate could not exceed Rs. 500 per sq. mtr., and the award fixing Rs. 600 per sq. mtr. was unsustainable.

Conclusion: The market value was reduced to Rs. 500 per sq. mtr., against the claimants and in favour of the acquiring body and the State.

Issue (ii): Whether the claimants were entitled to compensation for severance in respect of the unacquired balance land admeasuring 344 sq. mtrs.

Analysis: The remaining land was shown to have no proved independent access or demonstrated utility for the owners, and no material was produced to show that it could be separately used as an independent plot. In those circumstances, the finding that the balance area had been rendered unusable by the acquisition was upheld.

Conclusion: The claim for severance compensation was upheld in favour of the claimants.

Final Conclusion: The award was modified only to reduce the market rate from Rs. 600 per sq. mtr. to Rs. 500 per sq. mtr., while the grant of severance compensation for the balance land was maintained.

Ratio Decidendi: In land acquisition matters, market value must be fixed on the basis of the most comparable sale evidence and other reliable contemporaneous valuation material, and a government policy or ready reckoner may be relied upon where it represents the applicable valuation basis for the relevant date and locality.

---