Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI • Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions • Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations • Issue-wise legal analysis • Practical arguments and supporting content • Professionally structured draft ready for further review.
ITA: Late Fee Imposed Pre-Amendment Void. Assessee Prevails. The ITAT Cuttack allowed three appeals related to the levy of late fee under section 234E of the Income Tax Act for AY 2013-14. The tribunal held that the ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
ITA: Late Fee Imposed Pre-Amendment Void. Assessee Prevails.
The ITAT Cuttack allowed three appeals related to the levy of late fee under section 234E of the Income Tax Act for AY 2013-14. The tribunal held that the Assessing Officer lacked the power to impose late fees under section 234E before the amendment by the Finance Act, 2015. Relying on precedent, the tribunal set aside the imposition of late fees under section 200A read with 234E of the Act, ruling in favor of the assessee on 4th December 2019.
Issues: - Levy of late fee u/s.234E of the Income Tax Act for AY 2013-14 - Jurisdiction of Assessing Officer (AO) to levy late fee u/s.234E of the Act
Analysis: The Appellate Tribunal, ITAT Cuttack, considered three appeals for the AY 2013-14 related to the levy of late fee under section 234E of the Income Tax Act, passed under section 200A of the Act. The tribunal noted the absence of representation for the assessee. The Revenue's representative acknowledged that the AO lacked the power to impose late fees under section 234E of the Act for the relevant period, as per the provisions of section 200A. The representative further highlighted that the amendment by the Finance Act, 2015, effective from 01-06-2015, did not empower the AO to levy late fees before the amendment, rendering such levies legally unsustainable.
The tribunal relied on a decision by the Co-ordinate Bench of ITAT, Pune Tribunal, in the case of C&M Farming Ltd. vs. ACIT, where it was established that charging late fees under section 234E of the Act was not permissible even if TDS returns were filed belatedly and the AO issued intimation under section 200A after 01-06-2015. The tribunal found merit in the arguments presented, setting aside the imposition of late fees under section 200A read with 234E of the Act. Given the identical nature of the facts in the present case to the decision of the Co-ordinate Bench, the tribunal followed the precedent, concluding that the demand for late fees was not sustainable even if the returns were filed post-01-06-2015 and the late filing fee order was issued after the said date. Consequently, the tribunal allowed all the appeals of the assessee, pronouncing the order in favor of the assessee on 4th December 2019.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.