Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI • Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions • Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations • Issue-wise legal analysis • Practical arguments and supporting content • Professionally structured draft ready for further review.
Tribunal Invalidates Late Fee for A.Y. 2013-14 The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer lacked jurisdiction to charge late fee under section 234E for A.Y. 2013-14 due to the absence of enabling ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer lacked jurisdiction to charge late fee under section 234E for A.Y. 2013-14 due to the absence of enabling procedures for late fee computation under section 200A for that year. The provision for late fee computation was prospective from 01.06.2015, making the imposition of late fee invalid if returns were filed after that date. The Tribunal allowed the additional ground raised by the assessee, leading to the setting aside of the late fee imposition under sections 200A and 234E. As a result, all appeals by the assessee were allowed, granting relief in all cases.
Issues Involved: Late fee imposed under section 234E for A.Y. 2013-14 - Jurisdiction of AO to charge late fee under section 234E - Prospective nature of amendment - Applicability of late fee after 01.06.2015.
Analysis:
1. The appeals were filed by the assessee against a common order passed by CIT(A)-3, Nashik for A.Ys. 2013-14 to 2015-16. The assessee raised an additional ground of appeal regarding the imposition of late fee under section 234E for A.Y. 2013-14.
2. The assessee requested to take up the additional ground as a preliminary issue, which was agreed upon by both parties. The additional ground was raised in all appeals with similar facts, differing only in amounts. The Tribunal decided to adjudicate the additional ground in one appeal and pass a consolidated order for convenience.
3. The main issue was whether the CIT(A) was justified in confirming the late fee imposed in Q4-24Q for A.Y. 2013-14 under section 200A read with 234E of the Act. The assessee contended that the AO had no jurisdiction to charge late fee under section 234E due to the absence of enabling procedures for late fee computation under section 200A for the relevant year.
4. The assessee argued that the late fee computation provision was inserted in the Finance Act with prospective effect from 01.06.2015. Citing a Tribunal decision, the assessee claimed that charging late fee under section 234E was not valid if returns were filed after 01.06.2015, and the late fee was imposed later. The Tribunal found merit in the arguments and set aside the imposition of late fee under section 200A read with 234E.
5. The Tribunal referred to a previous case where it was held that charging late fee under section 234E was not permissible even if TDS returns were filed belatedly and the intimation was issued after 01.06.2015. Consequently, the additional ground raised by the assessee was allowed, rendering the main grounds unnecessary for adjudication.
6. Subsequently, all appeals by the assessee were allowed based on the decision in the initial appeal. The Tribunal pronounced the order on 6th November 2019, granting relief to the assessee in all the appeals.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.