Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the surplus realised on sale of plant and machinery, which had ceased to be used before the relevant accounting year, was chargeable as profit under section 10(2)(vii) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.
Analysis: The decisive test under section 10 is that the business must be carried on during the relevant year and the building, machinery or plant must have been used for the purposes of that business. The allowance and deeming provision in section 10(2)(vii) apply only where the assets sold are part of the plant and machinery used in the accounting year. Where the distribution business had already ceased and the relevant assets had been transferred before the accounting year began, the surplus on sale could not be treated as profit of that year. The reasoning followed the rule that depreciable assets not used at all during the year do not fall within the mischief of the proviso.
Conclusion: The surplus was not taxable under section 10(2)(vii); the answer to the reference was in the negative and the assessee succeeded.