Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, on a tenancy subsisting for twenty years or more in premises constructed in or before 1984 and used for commercial purpose, fair rent under Section 17(4A) of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997 is automatically determined on notice under Section 20 or whether an application to the Rent Controller under Section 17(1) is still necessary.
Analysis: Section 17(4A) was read with Section 17 as a whole, not in isolation. The scheme of the Act showed that Section 17(1) continues to make the Controller the authority to fix fair rent, while Section 17(4A) only prescribes the method by which the fair rent is to be determined in the specified class of tenancies. The use of different expressions in Section 18 and Section 17(4A), the language of Section 20, and the continued operation of Rule 8 of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Rules, 1999 all indicated that the legislature did not intend an automatic increase without recourse to the Rent Controller. Even where the calculation is arithmetical, the determination must still be made by the prescribed authority on an application.
Conclusion: An application before the Rent Controller is for fixation of fair rent under Section 17(4A), and the increase is not automatic upon notice under Section 20.