Appeal allowed for statistical purposes, case remanded for fresh examination. Tribunal directs re-examination based on potential additional evidence.

The appeal was treated as allowed for statistical purposes, and the case was remanded to the Assessing Officer for a fresh examination based on potential additional evidence to substantiate the claims made by the assessee. The Tribunal directed the AO to re-examine the issue in light of any documents related to criminal proceedings that could support the claim and set aside the issue of Rs. 3.00 lakhs reimbursement for further examination.

---

---

Issues:
Assessment of addition to the income of the assessee for the assessment year 2006-07.

Analysis:
The appeal was filed against the order confirming the addition of Rs. 11,75,000 to the income of the assessee. The case revolved around the investment of Rs. 18.00 lakhs by the assessee in a company. The Assessing Officer (AO) reopened the assessment due to this investment. The company had paid Rs. 6.25 lakhs to a person named Mr. A.L. Prasad and Rs. 5.75 lakhs by the son-in-law of the assessee, Shri Ruban Thomas, to arrange a foreign loan. However, the funds were not obtained, leading to the demand for repayment. The settlement resulted in the assessee receiving Rs. 18.00 lakhs from Mr. A.L. Prasad.

The AO accepted only Rs. 6.75 lakhs as a credit and treated the balance of Rs. 11.75 lakhs as the assessee's income. In the appellate proceedings, a relief of Rs. 3.00 lakhs was granted, and the balance addition was confirmed. The assessee claimed the funds from Shri Ruban Thomas were for reimbursement of expenses, but could not provide sufficient evidence. The dispute arose over the credibility of the claim of receiving Rs. 5.75 lakhs from Shri Ruban Thomas, who was working in Australia.

The Tribunal emphasized the initial onus on the assessee to prove the sources of investments. The assessee could not substantiate the claim of receiving funds from Shri Ruban Thomas adequately. The Tribunal directed the AO to re-examine the issue in light of any documents related to criminal proceedings that could support the claim. The Tribunal also linked the issue of Rs. 3.00 lakhs reimbursement to the claim of receiving funds from Shri Ruban Thomas, setting it aside for further examination.

In conclusion, the appeal was treated as allowed for statistical purposes, and the case was remanded to the AO for a fresh examination based on potential additional evidence to substantiate the claims made by the assessee.

---