Section 311 CrPC empowers courts to summon essential witnesses even after prosecution evidence closes to secure justice.

Section 311 CrPC confers wide discretion on the criminal court to summon, examine, recall, or re-examine witnesses at any stage if their evidence is essential to a just decision. Earlier negligence, lapse, or omission in producing material witnesses does not by itself defeat that power. The court must act to advance criminal justice and ensure that a murder trial proceeds with proper diligence and witness attendance. The application to summon and examine witnesses after closure of prosecution evidence was therefore maintainable and should have been allowed; the orders refusing examination could not stand.

---

---

Issues: Whether the Court could allow an application under Section 311 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 to summon and examine witnesses after the prosecution evidence had earlier been closed and whether the trial should proceed by ensuring the presence of witnesses.

Analysis: Section 311 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is of wide amplitude and empowers the Court at any stage of inquiry, trial or other proceeding to summon a witness, examine a person in attendance, or recall and re-examine a person already examined if the evidence is essential to a just decision. Negligence, lapse, or omission in earlier non-examination of material witnesses does not take away this power. The criminal court's duty is to advance the administration of criminal justice and not to permit the prosecution to fail because of avoidable procedural defaults. In a murder trial, the Court must ensure that witnesses are secured and the matter proceeds with proper diligence.

Conclusion: The application under Section 311 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was maintainable and ought to have been allowed; the earlier orders refusing to permit examination of witnesses could not stand.

---