Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the application under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was complete and maintainable, whether financial debt and default were established within limitation, and whether the corporate insolvency resolution process should be initiated.
Analysis: The petitioning financial creditor produced the loan documents, account statements, CIBIL record, charge filings, and banker's books certificate to show disbursement of financial debt, continuing liability, and default by the corporate debtor. The objection based on limitation was rejected because the record showed subsequent acknowledgments and transactions within the relevant period, and the application was found to have been filed within time. The pendency of SARFAESI and other recovery proceedings was held not to bar initiation of proceedings under the Code, since the remedy under the Code is in rem and independent of such proceedings. The application was also found to be complete, with notice served and an interim resolution professional proposed and consented.
Conclusion: The requirements for admission under section 7 were satisfied and the petition was admitted, with commencement of the corporate insolvency resolution process and appointment of the interim resolution professional.
Ratio Decidendi: Once a financial creditor establishes a financial debt, default, and a complete application within limitation, prior or parallel recovery proceedings do not prevent admission of a section 7 application and initiation of CIRP.