Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Insolvency and Bankruptcy

        2019 (3) TMI 1706 - Tri - Insolvency and Bankruptcy

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Approval of ArcelorMittal's Resolution Plan with Conditions The Resolution Plan submitted by ArcelorMittal India Pvt. Ltd. was conditionally approved, subject to the suggested equitable distribution of funds among ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Approval of ArcelorMittal's Resolution Plan with Conditions

                          The Resolution Plan submitted by ArcelorMittal India Pvt. Ltd. was conditionally approved, subject to the suggested equitable distribution of funds among creditors. The plan's approval is binding on all stakeholders, and the moratorium order ceases to have effect. The RP is directed to forward all records to the Board for recording in its database. All interim applications related to the CIRP are disposed of as infructuous.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Approval of the Resolution Plan under Section 31 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC).
                          2. Treatment of claims by financial creditors, operational creditors, and other stakeholders.
                          3. Requests for statutory reliefs and concessions.
                          4. Compliance with Section 30(2) of the IBC and Regulation 38 of the CIRP Regulations.
                          5. Objections by various creditors and stakeholders regarding the distribution of the resolution amount.
                          6. Judicial review of the Committee of Creditors (CoC) decisions.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Approval of the Resolution Plan:
                          The Resolution Professional (RP) submitted the Resolution Plan under Section 30(6) of the IBC, seeking approval from the Adjudicating Authority. The plan was approved by the CoC with a 92.24% majority vote. The Adjudicating Authority's role is to ensure that the plan complies with Section 30(2) of the IBC and does not contravene any laws. The plan is binding on all stakeholders once approved.

                          2. Treatment of Claims:
                          Financial Creditors:
                          The plan proposes an upfront payment of Rs. 42,000 crores to secured financial creditors and Rs. 17.4 crores to unsecured financial creditors. Additionally, Rs. 3.05 crores is proposed for unsecured financial creditors with claims less than Rs. 10 lakhs.

                          Operational Creditors:
                          The plan includes a provision of Rs. 196 crores for trade creditors and government creditors, and Rs. 18 crores for workmen and employees. However, operational creditors with claims above Rs. 1 crore are to receive a token amount of Rs. 1, which was deemed inequitable and discriminatory.

                          Other Creditors:
                          No payments were proposed for other creditors.

                          3. Requests for Statutory Reliefs and Concessions:
                          The Resolution Applicant sought several statutory reliefs and concessions, including exemptions from stamp duty, taxes, fees, and other charges. The Adjudicating Authority clarified that such requests fall within the domain of the appropriate government and statutory authorities and cannot be granted as a matter of right.

                          4. Compliance with Section 30(2) and Regulation 38:
                          The RP confirmed that the Resolution Plan met the requirements of Section 30(2) and Regulation 38 of the CIRP Regulations. The plan provided for the payment of insolvency resolution process costs, repayment to operational creditors, and management and supervision of the corporate debtor post-approval.

                          5. Objections by Creditors and Stakeholders:
                          Various creditors, including Standard Chartered Bank, objected to the plan's distribution method, arguing it was discriminatory. The Adjudicating Authority suggested a more equitable distribution method, proposing that 85% of the Rs. 42,000 crores be distributed among financial creditors and 15% among operational creditors and other stakeholders. This would ensure a fairer treatment of all creditors.

                          6. Judicial Review of CoC Decisions:
                          The Adjudicating Authority emphasized its limited scope in reviewing the commercial decisions of the CoC, as established by the Supreme Court in the K. Sashidhar case. The Authority can only ensure that the plan complies with the IBC and cannot substitute its judgment for the CoC's commercial wisdom.

                          Conclusion:
                          The Resolution Plan submitted by ArcelorMittal India Pvt. Ltd. was conditionally approved, subject to the suggested equitable distribution of funds among creditors. The plan's approval is binding on all stakeholders, and the moratorium order ceases to have effect. The RP is directed to forward all records to the Board for recording in its database. All interim applications related to the CIRP are disposed of as infructuous.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found