Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether reassessment proceedings initiated beyond five years from the end of the assessment year were barred by limitation under Section 25A of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003.
Analysis: Section 25A provides a five-year limitation for reopening of assessment, and the provision has been interpreted to require initiation of proceedings within that period. On the facts, the limitation expired on 31.03.2015, while the first notice was issued on 31.10.2015. The notice did not refer to any audit objection, and the record did not show that the proceedings were initiated within time on that basis. Mere detection of an offence was insufficient to extend the limitation.
Conclusion: The reassessment proceedings were initiated beyond the limitation period and were liable to be set aside. The assessment order was quashed, in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where reopening of assessment is subject to a statutory limitation period, the proceedings must be initiated within that period and cannot be sustained if the first notice is issued after limitation expires.