Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI • Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions • Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations • Issue-wise legal analysis • Practical arguments and supporting content • Professionally structured draft ready for further review.
Corporate Debtor Denied Order Recall, Must Pay $10,000 Cost The National Company Law Tribunal, Kolkata, denied the Corporate Debtor's application to recall an order due to non-appearance, citing lack of ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Corporate Debtor Denied Order Recall, Must Pay $10,000 Cost
The National Company Law Tribunal, Kolkata, denied the Corporate Debtor's application to recall an order due to non-appearance, citing lack of substantiation for the reason provided. Instead, the Tribunal allowed the Corporate Debtor to file a reply affidavit upon payment of a Rs. 10,000 cost to the Financial Creditor within 7 days. Failure to pay would lead to the closure of this opportunity. The judgment outlined subsequent procedural steps, emphasizing expeditious case progression with a hearing scheduled for 13/08/2019.
Issues: - Application for recalling of order dated 02/04/2019 due to non-appearance of Corporate Debtor - Alleged reason for non-appearance being the Advocate-on-Record suffering from high fever - Decision on allowing the Corporate Debtor to file a reply affidavit subject to payment of cost - Consequences if the cost is not paid within the stipulated time
Analysis: The judgment by the National Company Law Tribunal, Kolkata, involved an application by the Corporate Debtor for recalling an order due to their non-appearance on the specified date. The Corporate Debtor cited the reason for non-appearance as the Advocate-on-Record suffering from high fever. However, the Tribunal noted that no affidavit was submitted to substantiate this claim, leading to skepticism regarding the reason provided. Consequently, the Tribunal was disinclined to allow the application solely based on the grounds alleged.
In the interest of justice and to ensure a decision on the merits of the case, the Tribunal decided to permit the Corporate Debtor to file a reply affidavit. However, this allowance was subject to a condition - the payment of a cost amounting to Rs. 10,000 to be paid to the Financial Creditor within 7 days. This cost was intended to compensate any inconvenience caused to the Financial Creditor due to the non-appearance of the Corporate Debtor. It was explicitly stated that failure to pay the specified cost within the stipulated timeframe would result in the closure of the opportunity to file the reply affidavit.
Furthermore, the judgment outlined the procedural steps to be followed post the payment of the cost. Upon the payment of the cost, the Corporate Debtor was required to file the reply affidavit along with the Memo of Cost within 7 days from the date of payment. Subsequently, the Financial Creditor was directed to file a rejoinder within 7 days of receiving the reply affidavit, with the mandate to serve a copy of the rejoinder to the Corporate Debtor. The case was listed for further consideration on 13/08/2019, indicating the Tribunal's intent to progress the matter expeditiously and efficiently.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.