Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        1996 (9) TMI 650 - AT - Customs

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Rule 2(a) may classify SKD/CKD imports as cars, but not override exemption or import-policy permissions. SKD/CKD motor vehicle imports may be classified as complete motor cars for customs tariff purposes under Rule 2(a) when the consignments show the ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Rule 2(a) may classify SKD/CKD imports as cars, but not override exemption or import-policy permissions.

                          SKD/CKD motor vehicle imports may be classified as complete motor cars for customs tariff purposes under Rule 2(a) when the consignments show the essential character of finished vehicles, even though physically imported as components. That legal fiction does not automatically defeat customs exemption notifications: where the imported parts satisfy the notification conditions, exemption remains available according to the notification's terms. For import-control purposes, the same deeming rule cannot convert otherwise permitted components and parts into prohibited passenger cars. On the facts considered, the imports were covered by the applicable policy, and confiscation with redemption fine was not justified.




                          Issues: (i) Whether motor vehicle components imported in SKD/CKD form were to be classified as complete motor cars under the tariff by applying Rule 2(a); (ii) whether the assessees were entitled to the benefit of the relevant customs exemption notifications; (iii) whether the imports by Sipani Automobiles were permissible under the import policy and whether the goods were liable to confiscation.

                          Issue (i): Whether motor vehicle components imported in SKD/CKD form were to be classified as complete motor cars under the tariff by applying Rule 2(a).

                          Analysis: For tariff classification, incomplete or unassembled goods having the essential character of the finished article are classifiable as the complete article. The imported consignments, read with the agreements, invoices, bills of lading and the part-shipment nature of the imports, showed that complete cars were being brought in knock-down form. The legal fiction under Rule 2(a) applied for customs classification, even though the goods physically remained components, assemblies or sub-assemblies.

                          Conclusion: The goods were correctly classified as complete motor cars for customs purposes.

                          Issue (ii): Whether the assessees were entitled to the benefit of the relevant customs exemption notifications.

                          Analysis: The notifications granted exemption to specified components and parts required for manufacture of motor vehicles. The benefit could not be denied merely because the goods were treated as cars for tariff classification by legal fiction. However, the exemption had to be confined to the terms of the notifications and to the goods actually covered by them. On the facts found, the Maruti imports satisfied the conditions of the earlier notification, and the later notification could not be restricted only to the 20 items listed in the table when the imported goods were otherwise covered as parts and components.

                          Conclusion: The exemption was admissible, and the denial of the benefit was unsustainable.

                          Issue (iii): Whether the imports by Sipani Automobiles were permissible under the import policy and whether the goods were liable to confiscation.

                          Analysis: The import policy prohibited passenger cars, but permitted import of accessories, components, parts and spares of consumer durables by actual users under the public notice. The deeming fiction used for customs classification could not be extended to convert otherwise permitted components into prohibited goods for import-control purposes. There was no deliberate violation established, and the goods were covered by the public notice governing such imports.

                          Conclusion: The imports were permissible under the import policy and confiscation with redemption fine was not justified.

                          Final Conclusion: The impugned orders were modified. The imports were treated as cars only for customs classification, while the assessees were held entitled to the relevant exemption benefits and, in the Sipani matter, the confiscation and fine were set aside.

                          Ratio Decidendi: Rule 2(a) can be used to classify SKD/CKD imports as the complete article for tariff purposes, but that legal fiction does not automatically override the express language of an exemption notification or the import-control policy governing permitted imports of components and parts.


                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found