Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether construction workers engaged in erecting additional factory buildings and other ancillary structures for expansion of an existing factory were 'employees' within the meaning of Section 2(9) of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948.
Analysis: The relevant test was whether the work performed by the construction workers had a nexus with the factory's manufacturing activity and was incidental to or connected with the work of the factory. The factory's business was yarn production. Workers engaged in construction of additional buildings, annexes, rest houses, creches, cycle stands, time offices, and similar structures were engaged only for the temporary purpose of raising those structures. Their work did not bear the required connection with the manufacturing process itself. The earlier division bench ruling that such workers fall outside the inclusive definition governed the case.
Conclusion: Construction workers employed only for putting up additional structures for expansion of an existing factory were not 'employees' under Section 2(9) of the Act.
Ratio Decidendi: For the purpose of Section 2(9) of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, construction labour engaged merely in raising additional structures after the initial setting up of a factory is not covered unless the work has a real nexus with the factory's manufacturing activity and is incidental to or connected with that activity.