Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee had adduced relevant material to establish that the debts written off had become bad and irrecoverable in the relevant assessment year, so as to justify deduction.
Analysis: The governing principle under the Income-tax Act is that a debt is allowable as a bad debt only when it is established to have become bad in the previous year, and the question must be determined on the facts and circumstances of the relevant year from a practical and business point of view. The assessee bears the burden of showing that there was no reasonable expectation of recovery when the write-off was made. Subsequent events are relevant only to test the genuineness of the assessee's contemporaneous judgment, but they do not by themselves decide the issue. On the facts, the assessee had pursued decrees and continued recovery steps, and the Tribunal was entitled to hold that the assessee had not shown that the debts had lost every real chance of recovery in the assessment year.
Conclusion: The assessee failed to establish that the debts had become bad in the relevant year; the finding against deduction was sustainable and the answer was against the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: A debt is deductible as a bad debt only if, on objective facts existing in the relevant previous year, the assessee can reasonably establish irrecoverability on a practical and commercial assessment; the assessee's write-off is relevant but not conclusive, and the burden of proof remains on the assessee.