Section 7 insolvency admission turns on debt and default, while promoters cannot block the process with collateral objections.

In a section 7 Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code application, admission depends on proof of financial debt and default, and collateral objections by promoters or third parties cannot block consideration on grounds such as pending proceedings, rehabilitation efforts, or unaccepted settlement proposals. The tribunal also noted that exact quantification of the claim is not required at the admission stage. Loan records, restructuring history, account statements, SARFAESI notice, and supporting documents were treated as sufficient to establish debt and continuing default, while objections on documentation, limitation, security particulars, and demand notice were rejected as not defeating default.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether promoters or interveners could stall admission of a petition under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 on the basis of pending objections, rehabilitation efforts, or settlement proposals. (ii) Whether the financial creditor had established debt and default so as to justify admission of the corporate insolvency resolution process petition.

Issue (i): Whether promoters or interveners could stall admission of a petition under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 on the basis of pending objections, rehabilitation efforts, or settlement proposals.

Analysis: The petitioning financial creditor invoked section 7 read with Rule 4 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016. The order applied the principle that, at the admission stage, the adjudicating authority is concerned only with the existence of default, and that persons other than the corporate debtor do not have a right to obstruct admission on collateral grounds. Pending writ proceedings, objections regarding RBI directions, and unaccepted settlement proposals were treated as insufficient to prevent consideration of the petition.

Conclusion: The objection raised by the promoters failed, and they could not prevent admission of the petition.

Issue (ii): Whether the financial creditor had established debt and default so as to justify admission of the corporate insolvency resolution process petition.

Analysis: The order found that the loan facilities, restructuring history, account statements, SARFAESI notice, and supporting documents sufficiently demonstrated the financial debt and the continuing default. The adjudicating authority relied on the settled position that it is not required to determine the exact quantification of the claim at the admission stage, and that such matters may be dealt with by the resolution professional during the insolvency process. The objections regarding documentation, calculation, limitation, security particulars, and demand notice were rejected as not defeating the existence of default.

Conclusion: Debt and default were proved, and the section 7 application was admitted.

Final Conclusion: The petition was allowed, the corporate insolvency resolution process was initiated, and moratorium followed with appointment of the proposed interim resolution professional.

Ratio Decidendi: In an application under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, admission turns on the existence of debt and default alone, and promoters or third parties cannot obstruct the process by raising collateral objections or unaccepted settlement proposals.

---