Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether unexplained delay in considering the detenu's representation vitiated the preventive detention order.
Analysis: The representation was forwarded through the authorities over a period of time, but the State failed to explain the necessity for the delay or the interval during which no effective consideration was shown. In matters of preventive detention, a representation must be dealt with as promptly as possible, and even if the delay is not long, an unexplained delay becomes unreasonable. The absence of a satisfactory explanation showed routine and indifferent handling of the detenu's representation.
Conclusion: The unexplained delay rendered the continued detention illegal and the detention order could not be sustained.
Final Conclusion: The detention order was quashed and the detenu was directed to be released forthwith unless required in connection with another case.
Ratio Decidendi: Unexplained delay in the prompt consideration of a detenu's representation under preventive detention law invalidates the detention.