TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether permission to withdraw from the prosecutions under Section 494 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 was validly granted and whether the orders of acquittal required interference.
Analysis: Permission to withdraw from prosecution must be tested by whether the public prosecutor's function has been properly exercised and whether withdrawal serves the interests of administration of justice. Withdrawal is not confined to cases of paucity of evidence and may also be justified to advance broad ends of public justice, including appropriate social, economic, and political purposes. On the facts, the prosecutions were at an early stage, the State had taken a policy decision as part of an overall settlement, the accused were employees involved in a token strike, and no serious personal violence or material destruction of State property was involved. In those circumstances, the grant of permission was supported by the materials before the Magistrates and a retrial after a long lapse of time would not serve the interests of justice.
Conclusion: The withdrawal from prosecution was validly permitted and the orders of acquittal were correctly restored.
TaxTMI 
