Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the arbitration clause stating that disputes "can be settled by Arbitration" constituted a valid and binding arbitration agreement so as to justify stay of the suit under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
Analysis: The clause was construed as expressing only a possibility of arbitration, not an obligation to submit disputes to arbitration. A valid arbitration agreement requires a present and concluded agreement to submit present or future differences to arbitration. Words of mere possibility are insufficient, and a clause that leaves arbitration to a later agreement is only a contract to enter into a contract. The clause also did not clearly indicate whose option would trigger arbitration, and an uncertain or equivocal term cannot deprive a party of the ordinary right to sue in court.
Conclusion: The arbitration clause was held invalid and ineffective as an arbitration agreement. The application for stay was dismissed against the applicant.
Final Conclusion: The suit was allowed to proceed because the contractual stipulation did not create a binding submission to arbitration.
Ratio Decidendi: An arbitration clause must contain a present and concluded obligation to submit disputes to arbitration; a term expressing only that disputes "can" be arbitrated is merely permissive and does not amount to a valid arbitration agreement.