TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court upholds ITAT's exclusion of comparables, inclusion of one for AY 2011-2012.</h1> <h3>THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -3 Versus FLUOR DANIEL INDIA PVT. LTD.</h3> The High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal against an ITAT order regarding the exclusion of four comparables and inclusion of one for Assessment Year ... TP Adjustment - Comparable selection - HELD THAT:- Revenue concerns the exclusion of four comparables by the ITAT and inclusion of one as suggested by the Assessee. The Court notes that the ITAT has given detailed reasons in support of its conclusions by discussing each of the comparables from the point of view of the functionality assets and risk test in terms of Rule 10B of the Income Tax Rules. Court is unable to find any legal infirmity in the impugned order which gives rise to any the substantial question of law that requires determination. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. The High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal against an ITAT order regarding the exclusion of four comparables and inclusion of one for Assessment Year 2011-2012. ITAT provided detailed reasons for its conclusions based on Rule 10B of the Income Tax Rules. No legal infirmity found in the impugned order. The appeal was dismissed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
