Tribunal admits new ground on taxing book profits under Section 115JB, rules in favor of appellant company

The Tribunal admitted the additional ground regarding taxing book profits under Section 115JB, ruling it was a legal issue. It held that Section 115JB does not apply to the appellant company, a joint venture engaged in electricity distribution. The Tribunal rejected the addition on account of efficiency gain, following precedent that 50% of additional revenue from efficiency gains is not taxable. It affirmed the deduction under Section 80IA, stating enhanced profits due to disallowances qualify for deduction. The Tribunal allowed all appeals of the assessee and dismissed those of the Revenue, confirming its decisions.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Admission of additional ground regarding taxing book profits under Section 115JB of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
2. Applicability of Section 115JB to the appellant company.
3. Addition on account of de-recognition of revenue due to efficiency gain.
4. Claim of deduction under Chapter VIA, specifically Section 80IA of the Income-tax Act.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Admission of Additional Ground:
The assessee raised an additional ground stating, “That on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Assessing Officer erred in law in taxing book profits u/s 115JB of the Income-tax Act, 1961.” The Revenue objected to this additional ground, arguing it was not raised before the first appellate authority. However, the Tribunal admitted the additional ground, noting it was a purely legal issue requiring no verification of facts, citing the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in NTPC 229 ITR 383.

2. Applicability of Section 115JB:
The Tribunal referred to the Kerala High Court's judgment in the case of Kerala State Electricity Board 329 ITR 91, which held that Section 115JB, which creates a legal fiction regarding the total income of companies, does not apply to statutory corporations like the Electricity Board. The Tribunal found parity in facts with the appellant company, a joint venture of the Government of Delhi and Tata Power Ltd., engaged in electricity distribution. Following the Kerala High Court's ruling, the Tribunal held that Section 115JB does not apply to the appellant company and directed the Assessing Officer accordingly.

3. Addition on Account of Efficiency Gain:
The appellant contested the addition on account of de-recognition of revenue due to efficiency gain. The Tribunal noted that the Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission (DERC) determines tariffs to ensure the appellant recovers its costs and earns an assured return. Excess revenue over the trued-up cost is carried forward as a liability for future tariff adjustments, while deficits are recognized as assets. The Tribunal relied on a previous decision in ITA No. 4848/DEL/2010 and 5026/DEL/2010, where it was held that 50% of the additional revenue from efficiency gains is not taxable as it is used for future tariff fixation. The Tribunal allowed the assessee's grievance, following this precedent.

4. Claim of Deduction under Chapter VIA:
The Revenue appealed against the first appellate authority's allowance of the assessee's claim for deduction under Section 80IA. The Tribunal noted that the assessee had claimed a deduction of Rs. 98.38 crores under Section 80IA, which was not disputed by the Assessing Officer during assessment proceedings. The Tribunal found that the plant and machinery in the network had increased by more than 50% of the book value as on 01.04.2004, fulfilling the conditions for deduction under Section 80IA. The Tribunal referred to CBDT Circular No. 37/2016, which states that disallowances related to business activities against which Chapter VI-A deduction is claimed result in enhanced profits eligible for deduction. Following this Circular, the Tribunal held that the enhanced profits due to disallowances qualify for deduction under Section 80IA and dismissed the Revenue's appeal.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal allowed all the appeals of the assessee and dismissed all the appeals of the Revenue, confirming that:
1. The additional ground regarding Section 115JB was rightly admitted.
2. Section 115JB does not apply to the appellant company.
3. The addition on account of efficiency gain was not justified.
4. The deduction under Section 80IA was correctly allowed.

The order was pronounced in the open court on 14.06.2019.

---