Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether bail granted under Section 436 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in respect of bailable offences could be cancelled merely because the complainant was not heard and whether such cancellation could be justified on the ground of violation of natural justice.
Analysis: Offences under Sections 499 and 500 of the Indian Penal Code are bailable, and Section 436 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 confers an absolute right to bail in such cases if the accused is prepared to furnish bail or a bond on reasonable terms. In that situation, the court is required only to ascertain whether the offence is bailable and whether the accused is willing to comply with bail conditions. The complainant has no right to be heard before grant of bail in such a matter, and non-hearing of the complainant does not render the bail order void on principles of natural justice. Cancellation of bail in a bailable offence is permissible only on recognised grounds such as misuse of liberty or conduct prejudicial to a fair trial, not for want of notice to the complainant.
Conclusion: The cancellation of bail on the ground that the complainant was not heard was unsustainable, and the bail granted to the appellant was rightly restored.