Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether drawback at the All Industry Rate could be denied or restricted on the ground that packaging materials were procured without payment of duty from unregistered units against 'H' form, and whether such procurement could be treated as equivalent to manufacture or export under Rule 19(2) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002.
Analysis: The applicable drawback scheme fixes All Industry Rates on the basis of average incidence of duty and taxes on inputs and services used in exported goods. The governing notifications and the Drawback Rules permit denial of the rate only where the export is made after availing rebate of duty on materials used in manufacture or in terms of Rule 19(2) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. Procurement of inputs against 'H' form was not a disqualification under the relevant notifications, and it could not be equated with export under Rule 19(2). The field officers were also not vested with authority under the Drawback Rules to examine the duty-paid character of each input and reduce drawback on that basis. The denial of drawback on packaging materials therefore rested on an impermissible rewriting of the conditions in the notifications.
Conclusion: The restriction of drawback on packaging materials was unsustainable, and the applicant was entitled to drawback at the All Industry Rate.