Tribunal upholds duty on imported bones, rejects exemption claim, deems show-cause notice valid

The Tribunal upheld the demand for duty on imported crushed bones from Pakistan, ruling that the exemption claimed under Notification No. 67/2006-Cus. was not applicable to goods imported from Pakistan. The show-cause notice issued for short-levy of duty and penalty under Section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962 was deemed valid. The appeal challenging the duty demand on manually assessed entries was dismissed, emphasizing that once assessment is done, changes require filing an appeal. The Tribunal rejected the appellant's arguments, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.

---

---

Issues:
Import of crushed bones from Pakistan claiming exemption under Notification No. 67/2006-Cus., short-levy of duty, imposition of penalty under Section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962, appeal against penalty imposition, manual assessment of 4 bills of entry, demand for duty payment, interpretation of Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962.

Analysis:
The appellants imported crushed bones from Pakistan under 7 bills of entry, seeking exemption under Sl. No. 6 of Notification No. 67/2006-Cus. However, as Pakistan was listed in Appendix-2 of the notification, goods imported from Pakistan were not eligible for the exemption. A show-cause notice was issued for short-levy of duty amounting to Rs. 14,42,643/- with interest and penalty under Section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962. The original authority held that the exemption was not available, demanded the differential duty, and imposed a penalty. In the appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals), the penalty under Section 112(a)(ii) was set aside, but the demand for duty was upheld, leading to the current appeal.

During the hearing, the appellants argued that out of the 7 bills of entry, 4 were manually assessed by Customs officers who allowed the exemption under Notification No. 67/2006. They contended that had the ineligibility been pointed out during manual assessment, they would have paid the duty and not claimed exemption for the remaining entries processed through RMS. They cited the case law stating that once assessment is done, any changes require filing an appeal, which was not done in this case. They argued that the demand for duty on the manually assessed entries cannot be sustained.

The Revenue representative supported the impugned order, stating that under Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962, a show-cause notice can be issued to demand duty for non-levied or short-levied amounts. The Tribunal found no infirmity in the impugned order, noting that Section 28 allows for show-cause notices in such cases. The Tribunal rejected the appellant's arguments, emphasizing that the exemption under Notification No. 67/2006-Cus. was not applicable to goods imported from Pakistan. The attempt to set aside the duty demand on the manually assessed entries was seen as an indirect attempt to benefit wrongly. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.

In conclusion, the Tribunal upheld the demand for duty on the imported crushed bones from Pakistan, emphasizing the ineligibility for exemption and the validity of the show-cause notice issued under Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962. The appellant's attempt to benefit indirectly from an exemption not entitled to directly was not accepted, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.

---