Anticipatory bail in a Customs Act matter granted with conditions, while preserving the investigation agency's remand request rights.

Anticipatory bail was granted in a Customs Act matter after the Court considered the allegations, the applicant's limited role as an employee handling customs clearance and transportation, and the submission that other connected persons had already obtained bail. Without detailed examination of the evidence, the Court imposed conditions requiring cooperation with the investigation and availability for interrogation. It also preserved the Investigating Agency's to seek police remand before the competent Magistrate, while keeping the applicant's right to oppose any such request on merits open.

---

---

Issues: Whether the applicant was entitled to anticipatory bail in connection with the summons issued under the Customs Act.

Analysis: The Court considered the nature of the allegations, the role attributed to the applicant, and the fact that he was stated to be only an employee engaged in customs clearance and transportation work. It also noted the submission that other persons connected with the matter had already been granted bail. Without entering into a detailed evaluation of the evidence, the Court found it appropriate to grant anticipatory bail, subject to conditions ensuring cooperation with investigation and availability for interrogation. The Court further clarified that the Investigating Agency could still seek police remand before the competent Magistrate, and the applicant's right to oppose such request on merits would remain open.

Conclusion: Anticipatory bail was granted to the applicant on specified conditions.

---