Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the ex parte Tribunal order could be recalled on the assessee showing reasonable cause for non-appearance and on compliance with the condition of paying the appeal fee under the proper head.
Analysis: The assessee explained that non-appearance on the hearing date resulted from a bona fide misunderstanding of the defect memo and the date fixed by the Tribunal. The Tribunal found the explanation reasonable for the purpose of Rule 24 of the ITAT Rules, 1963 and was satisfied that sufficient cause existed to restore the matter. At the same time, the Tribunal noticed that the appeal fee had been paid under the wrong head and treated that defect as requiring fresh compliance.
Conclusion: The ex parte order was recalled in favour of the assessee, subject to fresh payment of appeal fee under the proper head within the stipulated time and production of proof on the next hearing date.