Company's Insolvency Application Admitted, Leading to Liquidation. Interim Resolution Professional Appointed The company's application under section 10 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was admitted, with an Interim Resolution Professional appointed. ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Company's Insolvency Application Admitted, Leading to Liquidation. Interim Resolution Professional Appointed
The company's application under section 10 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was admitted, with an Interim Resolution Professional appointed. Despite extensions, the resolution process failed, leading to liquidation due to the expiration of the statutory time limit for the resolution plan. A strategic investor's proposal was not timely considered, resulting in the appointment of a liquidator to commence the liquidation process. The order of liquidation marked the transition phase, ceasing the previous moratorium and initiating a fresh one under the IBC.
Issues: 1. Admission of company application under section 10 of IBC 2016. 2. Extension of time for submission of resolution plan. 3. Failure of resolution process and approval by COC. 4. Proposal by strategic investor and consideration by RP. 5. Initiation of liquidation process due to failure of resolution plan. 6. Appointment of liquidator and commencement of liquidation process.
Analysis: 1. The company application filed by Nicco Corporation Limited under section 10 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was admitted on 18th January 2017. Subsequently, Sri Kunal Banerjee was appointed as the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP), later confirmed as the Resolution Professional by the Committee of Creditors (COC). The Resolution Process was initially set to be completed by 16th July 2017.
2. The COC recommended a further extension of 90 days for the submission of the resolution plan, which ended on 14th October 2017. However, the Resolution Professional submitted a report on 12th October 2017, stating the failure of the Resolution Process during the COC meeting on 6th October 2017. The Resolution Plan for the revival of the Corporate Debtor was put to vote, with 88.38% of COC members voting against it.
3. Following the failure of the Resolution Plan, a strategic investor, M/S Shreekunj Securities Pvt Ltd, submitted a proposal to the RP, expressing interest in investing in the company. However, the complete proposal was not submitted in time for consideration before the COC meeting. A subsequent meeting of the COC was held on 11th October 2017 to discuss the future course of action.
4. Due to the statutory time limit of 270 days for the submission of the Resolution Plan being exceeded, the Corporate Debtor was directed to go into liquidation as per the provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Liquidation Process Regulation), 2016. The liquidator, Sri Vinod Kothari, PCS, was appointed to proceed with the liquidation process.
5. The order of Moratorium passed under Section 14 of the IB Code ceased to affect the proviso to subsection (4) of Section 14, and a fresh Moratorium commenced under subsection (5) of Section 33 of the IBC. The order of liquidation passed under Section 33 was deemed to be a notice of discharge to the officers, employees, and workmen of the corporate debtor, marking the transition into the liquidation phase.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.