Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty imposed under Section 15A(1)(o) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act was justified when the assessee showed that the goods were duly entered in its books of account at the place of registration and had been cleared by the tax authorities.
Analysis: The assessee produced material showing that the seized goods had been accounted for in the regular books of account at the place of business and had also been cleared by the tax authorities in Bihar. The State, in its supplementary counter affidavit, did not dispute the veracity of those tax clearances. On that basis, the factual foundation for the penalty was not made out.
Conclusion: The penalty under Section 15A(1)(o) was not justified and was deleted.