Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal Decision on Tax Exemption & TDS Non-Deduction</h1> <h3>State Bank of India Versus ACIT Circle 51 (1), New Delhi.</h3> The Tribunal upheld the denial of exemption under section 10(5) for reimbursement of Leave Travel Concession involving a foreign leg due to the assessee's ... Denial of exemption u/s 10(5) read with Rule 2B - reimbursement of Leave Travel Concession involving foreign leg through circuitous route as long as the employees designated place is in India for his leave travel concession and he actually visits the place as designated and the bank has not paid any amount for foreign tour which has been undertaken by the employee from his own pocket - HELD THAT:- We find that before the AO assessee has taken stand that assessee is not liable to deduct the TDS on payment of Leave Travel Concession which include the foreign travel and this stand was not accepted by the AO. Before the AO assessee has not raised any plea with regard to the payment of taxes on the receipt of such Leave Travel Concession by the employees/recipient. In such type of situation, where the assessee has not placed the relevant information with regard to the recipient/employees for payment of tax on such receipts of Leave Travel Concession the onus cannot shifts upon the Assessing Officer. As carefully examined the orders of the Tribunal in the case of Aligarh Muslim University and Branch Manager Allahabad Bank [2017 (8) TMI 278 - ITAT AGRA] and we find that in those cases Tribunal has held that where the relevant information is placed before the AO, AO is required to make necessary verification and without establishing that the recipient of such payment has not offered it to tax the assessee cannot be held to be in default. Since the assessee has not placed such information before the AO, we are of the view that AO is not under the obligation to make such enquiries without having the basic information. Therefore, we are of the view that let this matter go back to the AO for making a necessary verification with regard to payment of tax of such receipt by the recipient. We, accordingly, set aside the order of the CIT(A) and restore the matter to the AO with the directions to re-adjudicate the issue afresh after affording an opportunity of being heard to the assessee in the light of the aforesaid order of the Tribunal. The assessee is also directed to place all relevant information with regard to the recipient of such payments before the AO. Appeal of the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes. Issues Involved:1. Denial of exemption under section 10(5) for reimbursement of Leave Travel Concession involving foreign leg.2. Treatment of the bank as an 'assessee in default' for alleged non-deduction of TDS on reimbursement towards Leave Travel Concession.3. Direction to produce necessary evidence of employees' returns to the Assessing Officer.4. Confirmation of the action of Tax Officer to levy interest under section 201(1A) of the IT Act.Issue 1: Denial of exemption under section 10(5) for reimbursement of Leave Travel Concession involving foreign leg:The assessee appealed against the order of the CIT (A) denying exemption under section 10(5) for reimbursement of Leave Travel Concession involving foreign leg through a circuitous route. The contention was that as long as the employee's designated place is in India for the leave travel concession and the employee actually visits the designated place, and the bank has not paid any amount for the foreign tour, the exemption should apply. The Tribunal noted that the primary onus is on the assessee to provide relevant information and evidence regarding the payees' tax compliance. Since the assessee failed to furnish such information, the AO's finding that the assessee is in default for non-deduction of TDS was upheld. The Tribunal directed the matter back to the AO for necessary verification with directions to the assessee to provide all relevant information about the recipients of such payments.Issue 2: Treatment of the bank as an 'assessee in default' for alleged non-deduction of TDS:The assessee contended that the bank should not be treated as an 'assessee in default' for alleged non-deduction of TDS on reimbursement towards Leave Travel Concession. The Tribunal emphasized that without establishing that the recipient did not offer the payment to tax, the AO cannot hold the payer in default. However, since the assessee did not provide necessary information about the payees' tax compliance, the AO's finding of default was deemed proper. The Tribunal set aside the CIT (A)'s order and instructed the AO to re-adjudicate the issue after receiving all relevant information from the assessee.Issue 3: Direction to produce necessary evidence of employees' returns to the Assessing Officer:The CIT (A) directed the assessee to produce evidence of employees' returns to the AO, which the assessee argued was unnecessary as the AO could collect such evidence from the income tax department based on the information already provided. The Tribunal noted that the assessee failed to provide relevant information about the payees' tax compliance, shifting the onus back to the assessee. The order of the CIT (A) was set aside, and the matter was sent back to the AO for re-assessment.Issue 4: Confirmation of the action of Tax Officer to levy interest under section 201(1A) of the IT Act:The Tribunal also addressed the confirmation of the Tax Officer's action to levy interest under section 201(1A) of the IT Act. The Tribunal found that the AO's decision was based on the lack of relevant information provided by the assessee regarding the payees' tax compliance. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes, and the matter was remanded back to the AO for re-assessment based on the directions provided.In conclusion, the Tribunal's judgment focused on the assessee's failure to provide necessary information regarding the tax compliance of the payees, leading to the confirmation of the AO's findings and the direction for re-adjudication with the provision of complete information.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found