Tribunal adopts TNMM with 'Berry ratio' for arm's length price in transfer pricing case.

The Tribunal concluded that the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) with 'Berry ratio' as Profit Level Indicator (PLI) was the most appropriate method for determining the arm's length price of indenting transactions. The disallowance of legal and professional charges and the addition on account of bad debts were deleted. The matter was remanded to the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) to benchmark the international transactions using TNMM and 'Berry ratio'. The appeals were partly allowed for statistical purposes.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Determination of arm's length price (ALP) for indenting transactions between the assessee and its associated enterprises (AEs).
2. Applicability of Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) versus Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) method.
3. Use of 'Berry ratio' as Profit Level Indicator (PLI) under TNMM.
4. Disallowance of legal and professional charges.
5. Addition on account of bad debts and deposits written off.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Determination of ALP for Indenting Transactions:
The primary issue revolves around determining the ALP of indenting transactions between the assessee and its AEs for various assessment years. The Tribunal had to examine the similarity of indent AE transactions to ensure high comparability under the CUP method. The assessee argued that the transactions with AEs and non-AEs were dissimilar in terms of product categories, volumes, values, and geographical locations. The Tribunal noted that there were significant differences in the products and volumes transacted with AEs and non-AEs, making it inappropriate to use the average commission rate of non-AE transactions as a benchmark for AE transactions.

2. Applicability of TNMM versus CUP:
The Tribunal had to decide whether TNMM or CUP was the most appropriate method for determining the ALP. The Tribunal observed that CUP requires a high degree of similarity between controlled and uncontrolled transactions, which was not present in this case due to differences in products, volumes, and geographical locations. Consequently, the Tribunal rejected the CUP method and accepted TNMM as the most appropriate method, considering the assessee's consistent use of TNMM in previous years and the agreement under the Advance Pricing Agreement (APA) for subsequent years.

3. Use of 'Berry Ratio' as PLI under TNMM:
The Tribunal had to determine the appropriate PLI under TNMM. The High Court had permitted the use of 'Berry ratio' in situations where the value of goods is not directly linked to profits, and profits are mainly determined by operating expenses. The Tribunal noted that the assessee acted as a low-risk service provider with minimal financial risk and no significant asset deployment. Therefore, the 'Berry ratio' was deemed appropriate as it adequately represented the functions performed and risks undertaken by the assessee.

4. Disallowance of Legal and Professional Charges:
The Tribunal addressed the disallowance of legal and professional charges amounting to Rs. 3,72,560. The assessee argued that these were routine business expenses incurred during the regular course of business. The Tribunal noted that similar expenses had been allowed in previous and subsequent years and found no basis for the disallowance. Consequently, the Tribunal deleted the disallowance.

5. Addition on Account of Bad Debts and Deposits Written Off:
The Tribunal examined the addition of Rs. 2,56,257 on account of bad debts and deposits written off. The assessee clarified that no such deposit was written off in the relevant assessment year, and the amount was mistakenly taken from the previous year's profit and loss account. The Tribunal directed the deletion of this addition, as it was not justified on the facts presented.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal concluded that TNMM with 'Berry ratio' as PLI was the most appropriate method for determining the ALP of indenting transactions. The disallowance of legal and professional charges and the addition on account of bad debts were deleted. The matter was remanded to the TPO to benchmark the international transactions using TNMM and 'Berry ratio'. The appeals were partly allowed for statistical purposes.

---