NCLT dismisses SBI's insolvency application due to pending winding up proceedings

The National Company Law Tribunal dismissed the State Bank of India's application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code against M/s. Shakti Bhog Foods Limited due to pending winding up proceedings. The Tribunal clarified that the initiation of winding up proceedings or a liquidation order against a Corporate Debtor can impact the maintainability of applications under the I&B Code, emphasizing the hierarchy of insolvency processes and the implications of parallel proceedings on Corporate Debtors.

---

---

Issues:
1. Application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 filed by the State Bank of India for Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against M/s. Shakti Bhog Foods Limited dismissed due to pending winding up proceedings.
2. Interpretation of Section 238 of the I&B Code overriding other provisions, including winding up proceedings.
3. Consideration of whether the Adjudicating Authority can restore a company to the first stage of Resolution Process after winding up proceedings are initiated.

Analysis:
1. The Appellant, State Bank of India, filed an application under Section 7 of the I&B Code against M/s. Shakti Bhog Foods Limited for Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process. The National Company Law Tribunal dismissed the petition citing pending winding up proceedings against the Corporate Debtor. The Appellant argued that Section 238 of the I&B Code should override other provisions, including winding up proceedings initiated under the Companies Act, 1956.

2. The Appellate Tribunal referred to previous judgments to analyze the issue. It was noted that if a winding up proceeding has been initiated or a liquidation order passed against a Corporate Debtor, an application under Section 10 is not maintainable. However, if only a winding up petition is pending without an order of winding up or liquidation, it cannot be a ground to reject an application under Section 10. The Tribunal clarified that the term "winding up" is synonymous with "liquidation" as per the I&B Code.

3. In another case, the Tribunal reiterated that if a Corporate Debtor is already undergoing Corporate Insolvency Resolution or facing liquidation proceedings, a fresh application under Section 7 or 9 against the same Corporate Debtor is not maintainable. The Tribunal emphasized that once winding up proceedings have been initiated and ordered by the High Court, the question of initiating Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process does not arise. The Tribunal upheld the decision based on previous judgments and dismissed the appeal without costs.

In conclusion, the judgment highlights the interplay between the I&B Code and winding up proceedings under the Companies Act, emphasizing that the initiation of winding up proceedings or a liquidation order against a Corporate Debtor can impact the maintainability of applications under the I&B Code. The Tribunal's analysis provides clarity on the hierarchy of insolvency processes and the implications of parallel proceedings on Corporate Debtors.

---