Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether receipts from sale of software products to the Indian distributor constituted royalty taxable in India under section 9(1)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, or under the India-USA Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement.
Analysis: The receipts arose from the same regional support agreements that had earlier been examined in the assessee's own case. The earlier coordinate bench decisions had held that the payments were for sale of copyrighted software and not for transfer of copyright rights, and that the DTAA definition of royalty controlled where it was more beneficial to the assessee. The subsequent domestic law amendment enlarging the definition of royalty under section 9(1)(vi) did not alter the treaty definition under Article 12(3), and the treaty position remained more favourable. On that basis, the receipts could not be treated as royalty income chargeable to tax in India. The challenge to the assessment for want of a draft assessment order was not adjudicated because it became academic after the merits were decided.
Conclusion: The receipts were not taxable as royalty in India and the addition was deleted.