Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the expression "immediately" in Order XXI Rule 84(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 requires literal instantaneous payment of the 25% deposit by the auction-purchaser, or permits deposit within a reasonable time in the circumstances of the sale.
Analysis: The deposit obligation under Order XXI Rule 84(1) arises after the purchaser is declared at the sale. In the circumstances of this execution sale, the highest bidder was not present when the court accepted the bid, the declaration had to be arranged through the court machinery, and notice of the acceptance reached him only later in the day. The Court construed the word "immediately" in light of the local procedural setting and the practical time available for compliance, holding that the expression did not require exclusion of all intervening time regardless of reasonableness. The construction adopted was that "immediately" means within a reasonable time, having regard to the facts of the case.
Conclusion: The deposit made on the next working day was valid compliance with Order XXI Rule 84(1), and the sale was not a nullity.