Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to small scale exemption for diaries printed for LIC despite the presence of LIC's name and logo on the diaries.
Analysis: The exemption notification denied benefit to specified goods bearing the brand name or trade name of another person. The diaries were printed for LIC, whose business is life insurance and not the manufacture or trade of diaries. Applying the CBEC clarification that the mischief of the brand name restriction arises only when the mark is used in connection with branded goods in the course of trade, the presence of LIC's name and logo on diaries printed on LIC's behalf did not amount to brand use attracting the exclusion.
Conclusion: The denial of SSI exemption was not justified and the appellant was entitled to the exemption in respect of the diaries cleared to LIC.