Pendency of tax penalty proceedings does not automatically bar Section 277 prosecution or justify quashing the criminal case.

Pendency of penalty proceedings or a reference does not by itself justify quashing a prosecution under Section 277 of the Income-tax Act. Mere possibility of a future favourable finding for the assessee is insufficient to invoke inherent jurisdiction to stop the criminal case, especially where the criminal proceedings have already been validly instituted. The court distinguished situations in which appellate or tribunal findings had already gone in favour of the assessee and treated those as materially different. On the facts discussed, the prosecution was not regarded as an abuse of process and the request to quash was rejected.

---

---

Issues: Whether criminal prosecution under Section 277 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 should be quashed under the inherent jurisdiction of the High Court on the ground that penalty proceedings or a pending reference may ultimately result in a finding favourable to the assessee.

Analysis: The pendency of a reference against the penalty order did not, by itself, extinguish the prosecution. The Court distinguished cases where the Tribunal had already recorded findings in favour of the assessee and held that mere expectation of a possible favourable result in future proceedings was insufficient to stop the criminal case. It was also observed that proceedings already instituted in the criminal court should not be treated as an abuse of process merely because subsequent appellate or reference proceedings might alter the position.

Conclusion: The request to quash the prosecution was rejected.

---