Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a criminal complaint under section 277 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 could be sustained when the penalty order forming its basis had been quashed in appeal, and whether the complaint and proceedings were liable to be quashed under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
Analysis: The complaint rested on the penalty order passed in assessment proceedings. That order had already been set aside by the appellate authority. In these circumstances, the basis for alleging criminality under section 277 no longer survived. The settled position applied was that where there is no case for sustaining penalty, there is equally no case for criminal prosecution. The Court found the petitioner's challenge well founded and found no answer from the revenue to distinguish the governing principle.
Conclusion: The criminal complaint and the proceedings arising from it were quashed in favour of the petitioner.