Tribunal grants insolvency application under Bankruptcy Code due to default, appoints Resolution Professional

The Tribunal granted the application for insolvency under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, finding the debt as "Operational Debt" with a default by the Corporate Debtor. The Petitioner provided evidence of non-payment, leading to the admission of the petition. An Insolvency Resolution Professional was appointed, and a Moratorium was implemented as part of the insolvency resolution process. The judgment outlined further steps including the Public Announcement and compliance reports for the appointed IRP.

---

---

Issues:
1. Application for insolvency under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code
2. Nature of debt and default by the Corporate Debtor
3. Evidence of non-payment and admission of liability
4. Admissibility of the petition and appointment of Insolvency Resolution Professional
5. Implementation of Moratorium and further steps in the insolvency resolution process

Analysis:

1. The judgment pertains to an application filed by the Petitioner under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code as an Operational Creditor. The Petitioner invoked the provisions of section 9 of the Code by submitting Form No. 5 under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016.

2. The particulars of the operational debt included a principal amount in default along with interest. The debt arose from the need for the supply of thermal coal from the Corporate Debtor, as per a Work Order issued by the Petitioner to the Debtor.

3. The Corporate Debtor failed to supply the coal despite receiving an advance payment from the Petitioner. The Debtor admitted liability to refund the advance amount but did not make the payment. The Petitioner issued demand notices, and the Corporate Debtor did not raise any dispute regarding the outstanding amount.

4. The Tribunal found that the debt qualified as an "Operational Debt" under the Code, and there was a default on the part of the Corporate Debtor. The Petitioner had provided evidence of non-payment, and the Corporate Debtor did not dispute the claim within the prescribed period, leading to the admission of the petition.

5. Following the admission of the application, the Tribunal directed the appointment of an Insolvency Resolution Professional and implementation of a Moratorium as per the provisions of the Code. The next steps in the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, including the Public Announcement and compliance reports, were outlined for the appointed IRP.

This comprehensive analysis covers the key issues addressed in the judgment, detailing the nature of the debt, evidence of default, admissibility of the petition, and the subsequent steps in the insolvency resolution process as directed by the Tribunal.

---