Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Transfer Pricing Appeal: Functional Comparability & Working Capital Adjustments</h1> <h3>M/s. TE Connectivity Global Shared Services India Pvt. Ltd. Versus Income Tax Officer, Ward 11 (1), Bangalore</h3> M/s. TE Connectivity Global Shared Services India Pvt. Ltd. Versus Income Tax Officer, Ward 11 (1), Bangalore - TMI Issues Involved:1. Rejection of Transfer Pricing (TP) documentation and adjustment to transfer price.2. Exclusion/Inclusion of specific companies in the list of comparables for software development services and ITES segments.3. Application of multiple year/prior year data for comparability.4. Functional dissimilarity of certain comparables.5. Working capital adjustment in the computation of Arm’s Length Price (ALP).Detailed Analysis:1. Rejection of TP Documentation and Adjustment to Transfer Price:The assessee, a company providing software development and ITES services to its AE, filed its return for AY 2009-10 declaring income after claiming a deduction under Section 10A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The TPO proposed a TP adjustment of Rs. 2,74,00,673, which was included in the final assessment. The CIT (Appeals) provided partial relief, leading the assessee to appeal to the Tribunal. The Tribunal noted that the assessee was not pressing certain grounds related to the rejection of TP documentation and adjustments, rendering those grounds infructuous.2. Exclusion/Inclusion of Specific Companies in Comparables:The Tribunal focused on the exclusion/inclusion of certain companies in the comparables list for the software development and ITES segments:Software Development Services Segment:- Exclusion:- KALS Information Systems Ltd.: Excluded due to its involvement in software product development and training, making it functionally dissimilar to the assessee.- Bodhtree Consulting Ltd.: Excluded as it was engaged in software products, web solutions, and data management, which are functionally different.- Tata Elxsi Ltd.: Excluded due to its involvement in product design services, engineering services, and visual computing labs, making it functionally different.- Infosys Technologies Ltd.: Excluded because of its significant intangibles, brand value, R&D activities, and large scale of operations.- Persistent Systems Ltd.: Excluded as it was involved in software product development and product design services.- Larsen & Toubro Infotech Ltd.: Included despite objections, as the Tribunal upheld the authorities' view that RPT filter at 25% of turnover is reasonable.- Inclusion:- Thinksoft Global Services Ltd. and FCS Software Solutions Ltd.: Initially proposed by the TPO but excluded due to working capital adjustments. The Tribunal directed their inclusion and set aside the issue of working out the correct PLI by computing and allowing working capital adjustment on an actual basis.ITES Segment:- Exclusion:- Infosys BPO Limited, Accentia Technologies Limited, Cosmic Global Limited, and Eclerx Services Limited: Excluded based on functional dissimilarity as decided in the case of Novo Nordisk India Pvt. Ltd.- Aditya Birla Minacs Worldwide Limited: Included despite objections, as the Tribunal upheld the authorities' view that RPT filter at 25% of turnover is reasonable.3. Application of Multiple Year/Prior Year Data for Comparability:The Tribunal dismissed the assessee's grounds regarding the use of multiple year/prior year data, as these were not pressed by the assessee.4. Functional Dissimilarity of Certain Comparables:The Tribunal excluded several companies from the comparables list based on functional dissimilarity, as these companies were engaged in activities such as software product development, which were not comparable to the assessee's software development services.5. Working Capital Adjustment in ALP Computation:The Tribunal directed the TPO to compute and allow working capital adjustment on an actual basis for the final set of comparables, ensuring a more accurate determination of the ALP.Conclusion:The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee's appeal, providing relief by excluding certain companies from the comparables list based on functional dissimilarity and directing the inclusion of others with proper working capital adjustments. The decision emphasized the importance of accurate functional comparability and appropriate adjustments in TP assessments.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found