Service tax exemptions for electricity transmission work and non-commercial construction to a government authority sustained the demand challenge.
Services rendered for establishment of electric sub-stations were treated as connected with transmission of electricity, and the exemption under Notification No. 11/2010-ST was held applicable; the service tax demand on that count was unsustainable. Construction services provided to Noida Authority for a non-commercial purpose were also covered by Notification No. 25/2012-ST because the work was for a governmental authority and not for industrial, commercial, or business use; the demand on that count was likewise unsustainable. On both issues, the service tax demand failed.
Issues: (i) Whether the services rendered for establishment of electric sub-stations were exempt from service tax under Notification No. 11/2010-ST dated 27.02.2010; (ii) Whether construction activity for the Noida Authority, being for a non-commercial purpose, was exempt under Notification No. 25/2012-ST dated 20.06.2012.
Issue (i): Whether the services rendered for establishment of electric sub-stations were exempt from service tax under Notification No. 11/2010-ST dated 27.02.2010.
Analysis: The services were found to be rendered in relation to establishment of electric sub-stations and thus relatable to transmission of electricity. The exemption notification was treated as wide enough to cover services connected with transmission of electricity, and the earlier order in the assessee's own case on the same issue had already granted relief.
Conclusion: The exemption under Notification No. 11/2010-ST was admissible, and the demand on this count was not sustainable.
Issue (ii): Whether construction activity for the Noida Authority, being for a non-commercial purpose, was exempt under Notification No. 25/2012-ST dated 20.06.2012.
Analysis: The construction was for the Noida Authority and was not for any industrial, commercial, or business purpose. Services provided to a governmental authority by way of construction of a civil structure meant predominantly for use other than commerce or industry were covered by the exemption notification.
Conclusion: The exemption under Notification No. 25/2012-ST was admissible, and the demand on this count was not sustainable.
Final Conclusion: The service tax demand was held to be unsustainable on both issues, and the Revenue's appeal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Services rendered in relation to transmission of electricity, and construction services provided to a governmental authority for non-commercial use, are entitled to the applicable exemption notifications and cannot be subjected to service tax.
TaxTMI 
AI Drafter ✕
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
