Tax Appeal Dismissed: Mumbai Tribunal Upholds CBDT Circular Due to Low Tax Impact Below 20 Lakhs for Assessment Year 2009-10. The ITAT Mumbai dismissed the Revenue's appeal against the CIT(A)-20, Mumbai's order for A.Y. 2009-10 under the IT Act due to the tax effect being below ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Tax Appeal Dismissed: Mumbai Tribunal Upholds CBDT Circular Due to Low Tax Impact Below 20 Lakhs for Assessment Year 2009-10.
The ITAT Mumbai dismissed the Revenue's appeal against the CIT(A)-20, Mumbai's order for A.Y. 2009-10 under the IT Act due to the tax effect being below 20 lakhs, in accordance with CBDT Circular No. 3/2018. The Tribunal noted that the issue was already addressed in a prior decision for A.Y. 2010-11 and found no exceptions to the circular's directive, rendering the appeal not maintainable. Consequently, the appeal was deemed infructuous and dismissed.
Issues: - Appeal filed by Revenue against CIT(A)-20, Mumbai order for A.Y.2009-10 under IT Act. - Tax effect below 20 lakhs as per CBDT Circular No. 3/2018. - Tribunal's decision in assessee's case for A.Y.2010-11 regarding addition to bogus purchases. - Applicability of CBDT Circular No. 3/2018 on the present appeal. - Dismissal of Revenue's appeal due to tax effect not exceeding 20 lakhs.
Analysis: The judgment by the Appellate Tribunal ITAT MUMBAI involved an appeal by the Revenue against the order of CIT(A)-20, Mumbai for the assessment year 2009-10 under the Income Tax Act. The learned AR representing the appellant pointed out that the tax effect in the appeal was below 20 lakhs, citing CBDT Circular No. 3/2018 dated 11.07.2018, which recommends dismissing such appeals. The AR also referred to a previous decision by the Tribunal in the assessee's case for A.Y.2010-11, where an addition to bogus purchases was upheld.
Upon reviewing the orders of the lower authorities, the Tribunal noted that the issue in the present appeal was already covered by its earlier decision in the assessee's case for A.Y.2010-11. Additionally, the tax effect in the current appeal did not exceed 20 lakhs. The Tribunal highlighted the power vested by sec. 268A(1) of the IT Act, emphasizing the CBDT Circular No. 3/2018 instructing that departmental appeals with a tax effect below 20 lakhs should not be pursued before the ITAT.
The CBDT circular further directed that unless there are exceptions, all departmental appeals pending before ITAT with a tax effect below 20 lakhs should be withdrawn or not pressed by the Departmental representative. The Tribunal found that the present appeal did not fall under any exceptions mentioned in the circular and, as the tax demand did not exceed 20 lakhs, the appeal was deemed not maintainable. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal of the Revenue as not pressed or withdrawn, rendering it infructuous. The final decision was the dismissal of the Revenue's appeal due to the tax effect not exceeding the specified limit of 20 lakhs as per the CBDT Circular.
In conclusion, the judgment emphasized the application of the CBDT Circular No. 3/2018 regarding the tax effect threshold for departmental appeals, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue's appeal based on the prescribed limit and previous Tribunal decisions in the assessee's case.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.