TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether directions were required for prompt reporting on the disposal of seized properties and vehicles, and for fresh inspection of police stations and malkhanas.
Analysis: The order proceeds on the basis of earlier Supreme Court directions on preservation and timely disposal of seized vehicles and case properties, including the exercise of powers under Section 451 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. In view of the large number of properties and vehicles stated to be in custody, the Court called for a status report on compliance with the earlier directions, including whether responsible officers were monitoring police stations, whether seized properties were being promptly produced before the Magistrate, and whether applications for disposal were being moved. The Court also directed the Superintendent of Police or an equivalent officer to conduct a fresh inspection and report on disposal of seized vehicles and the condition of the malkhanas.
Conclusion: Directions were issued for filing of a status report and for fresh inspection and reporting, in aid of compliance with the existing legal regime governing custody and disposal of seized property.
TaxTMI 
