Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether amended Rule 8(8) of the Tamil Nadu Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1959, which enhanced the lease period for quarrying stone in virgin areas, operated retrospectively so as to apply to leases granted before the amendment.
Analysis: A statutory amendment is presumed to operate prospectively unless retrospective intent appears expressly or by necessary implication. While procedural provisions may apply to pending matters, a provision that affects substantive rights does not become retrospective merely because it is placed in a procedural framework. The amendment to Rule 8(8) introduced, for the first time, a distinction between virgin and non-virgin areas and conferred a new entitlement of a ten-year lease only for virgin areas. The earlier regime, under which the notification was issued, the auction held, and the lease deeds executed for five years, contained no such distinction. The fixation of lease period was therefore an integral part of the substantive rights created by the rule and not a matter of procedure.
Conclusion: The amended rule was held to be substantive in nature and not retrospective; it did not extend the lease period of pre-existing leases, and the challenge by the appellants succeeded.
Final Conclusion: The appeals were allowed, and the High Court's view that the amendment applied to earlier leases was set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: An amendment that alters the duration and incidents of a lease and creates a new classification affecting rights is substantive in nature and, absent clear retrospective intent, applies only prospectively.