Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the original application before the Tribunal was barred by limitation under Section 21 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 and could be entertained in the absence of an application for condonation of delay.
Analysis: The application was filed beyond the statutory period prescribed by Section 21(1), and no application invoking Section 21(3) for condonation of delay was made before the Tribunal. The explanation later offered could not be considered because it had not been laid as a foundation before the Tribunal. Once the application was time-barred, the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to admit it and decide it on merits.
Conclusion: The original application was barred by limitation and could not have been entertained on merits.